As the building, then dwindling, though persistent, storm of conversation, gossip, frustration, mixed with the misreported words of the recent article, "Art Exhibitions Pulled From Arts Festival; Students Call it ‘Censorship' Based on Aesthetics," in The Statesman continued to roll through personal emails, onto listservs, into conversations about the circumstances of not only morale but even a sense of viability of individuals and their scholarship on Stony Brook's beautifully landscaped but prosaically hierarchic campus, I sat with the Chair of the Art Department, Professor Anita Moskowitz, to ask basically four questions about the outcome of the art installation, "Unbound," and the separate event, "Who is Asia America." Sponsored and co-sponsored, respectively, by the Art Department, these events featured the work of some of the University's most promising students of art. Both of which met with not only interference but imposed reconfiguration (that is to say, the removal of one installation piece and the restraint of a performance) because of liability issues presented by the President and her Office after the commencement of these events.
Leave Feedback
Printer Friendly Format
"The analogy was made: ‘you wouldn't tear up someone's conference paper before they had a chance to read it.' This is our research...The bear came down."